By Joseph Capp
A significantly advanced ET technology would look like magic…
but would they act like magic... intentionally?
You know what really p***es me off?
When self-righteous scientists and debunkers claim that, if they
had a chance to see some quote real, unquote, evidence on UFOs,
they would be fighting each other in their race to get the first
look.
But the truth is, they don't want to see.
The righteous debunkers and scientists are just like the Dark
Ages clergy who were confronted by Galileo. All the outraged
Church's agents of the Dark Ages had to do was look and they
would see. But to those True Believers, no matter what the sky
showed them, the universe must be literally what their one-track
religion said it should be, and that was the end of it.
We still have an uneven playing field out there in Science Land.
The Spirit of Scientific Inquiry is not really practiced today
by many mainstream science practitioners and information
distillers. What is widely practiced is bowing low to The Spirit
of Government Grant Renewal, and the unfortunate, irrational
worship of Establishment Science.
Scientists make the bald-faced claim aliens don't exist, even
though there's a case to be made that scientists are aliens
themselves, living on a planet full of aliens, exploring space
beyond their host world.
We also can make an argument of "absolute nonsense" when this
group worshippers of establishment scientist make public
proclamation of how intelligent ETs should and would not behave.
Dismissing the existence of ETs because they act like magic and
don't live up to our standards of behavior is funny when you
think of it. Yeah, we laugh at their irrational claims, but we
keep letting scientists and debunkers get away with it.
It is a sad state of affairs when ridicule, fear and persecution
are orchestrated not by religious fanatics and their dogma, but
by scientists.
DVD Phoenix Lights And Mainstreme Voodo Science:
The only way a worldview outside the narrow one dictated by the
Science establishment can be investigated in real time – with
expensive instruments, in the presence of physical evidence - is
through independent research funding, like that lately provided
MUFON by insightful multimillionaire Robert Bigelow, or a
commercial TV program like UFO Hunters who spend money for
ratings.
Many of you know about Chuck Wade from Roswell and his attemps
to have his material from The San Augusta UFO crash tested,…if
not read UFOMM posts:
http://tinyurl.com/d2xnpzhttp://tinyurl.com/cq7a3nChuck was an engineer by profession, a good family man who
worked hard and paid his dues. But Chuck was part of a town that
was never given its due by the media, the debunkers, and even
some UFO researchers: Roswell.
Chuck and others came forward to say what they found could be
the real UFO beef everyone's been waiting for, but their pleas
for proper inquiry were largely ignored.
And this highlights another major conflict in the UFO truth
quest: a class of witnesses we should pay special attention to,
the aptly yet sadly group known as Death Bed Witnesses. These
Americans about to meet the God they believe in, feel it is
essential to clear their hearts of a terrible burden and tell
their families of a secret they were sworn by their government
to not divulge.
Why don't we give the death bed testimonials of UFO witnesses
the respect and evidentiary consideration they merit? These
witnesses have nothing to gain on this earth by coming forward,
no book tour, no TV interview, no time to build a McMansion or
squander a giant media fee on the roulette wheels in Vegas…yet
we fail ourselves and humanity's future when we denigrate the
death bed testimonials.
The special burden of the deathbed witnesses is a burden they
swore to keep, and most witnesses took their official oaths of
secrecy so seriously, they never shared their testimony or
evidence with spouses, much less UFO researchers. Yet the death
bed witnesses' burden was the most fantastic news ever shared
with humankind: the news that we are not alone in the Universe.
Among these confessions was the first-hand truth about how a
ship from space crashed in Corona with little creatures aboard.
Just as with all of the more startling UFO information cases,
except for some initial sensationalism, the Roswell-Corona
witnesses barely get a yawn from all but the pro-Roswell
factions among UFO researchers.
DVD Clip Intelligen Flares All Over The World!
Of course we also get the slight-of-hand distraction from the
debunkers, but they're singing to the nothings-true-till-we-say-
so choir.
So again, let's remember with gratitude Chuck Wade and others,
who took precious days out of their retired lives, days where
most retirees are playing golf, traveling, or taking the
grandkids to the big game, to seek an answer for the rest of us.
Chuck's predecessor Art Campbell after decades of trying to put
the pieces together on a certain UFO crash site finally mapped
out where witness testimony said the crash material would be.
Campbell dug, and he found - in the middle of nowhere - an
aluminum pieces and other material that should not be. His work
in this debris field is known in UFO history as the San Augusta
crash site. Chuck eventually joined him and now we have
promising investigation with no ending.
The aluminum was a composite material they found was not made by
any commercial manufacturer. As an aluminum compositionally it
didn't even make any sense. Throughout the structure of this
particular aluminum sample were iron and silica. The sample's
heavy metal - iron - should have sunk by its own weight to the
bottom of the aluminum during manufacture, according to the laws
of good old gravity. But no, there it was, latticed throughout
the host metal.
Testing showed this material deserved further inquiry. But what
the owner of the sample got was just a superficial analyses.
Case Closed?
What you don't know is that when I was putting together the
posts "Has Roswell Evidence Finally Emerged?" Parts 1 and 2, I'd
hoped this case's material evidence was testing out Positive:
Not Of Earth Manufacture.
My experience with this material came about at the International
UFO Congress. I kept bugging a good friend to come with me to a
UFO conference. He works for a top company in the nano-tech
field. My friend had personal experience with UFOs - what he
describes as his most astounding - after we met. He had called
me from the car after the incident, where, along with his whole
family, he had witnessed the "craft". So he came to the Congress
with a new level of interest. At the Congress, witness Chuck
Wade was being interviewed by overseas meida shows, and also,
Joshua Warren a skeptic but a strong advocate for further
testing on Chuck's artifacts included in his Presentation on
"Physically Faking UFOs", included the peculiar behavior in a
electrostat of the material Chuck supplied him. Warren announced
he be would testing the material on a deeper level because of
this experience.
Chuck Wade was not hesitant in offering the samples to the
researchers he knew could really help get the puzzle of the UFO
crash field metal sample solved. Chuck won my respect right away
with that attitude. My friend - with the nano-tech lab - also
believed Chuck Wade was for real, whatever the outcome of the
crash field metal. So with a little prodding on my part, my
buddy had some pieces shipped to him. Because of the depressed
economy, my friend's company wasn't overbooked; they had the
time to run complete tests.
We all knew, that given this company's prestige, if they took
the field metal analysis on, the answer would be definitive.
At first it looked very promising. My friend showed a sample to
his peers and they seemed interested. Sample fragments in hand
now, they wanted to look at past test results. After they review
the earlier lab results, further tests seemed to be
greenlighted. I was very pleased with the way it was turning
out.
But someone at the company with the final authority shot it
down. Maybe the decision not to test the material wasn't the
latest scandal in a big conspiracy… maybe it's just the ongoing
business as usual vis-a-vis anything connected with the UFO
subject.
However, we still have the intrepid investigator, young Joshua
P. Warren, continuing with his own effort to get this material
analyzed by a recognized facility. We should all be grateful for
Warren's foresight and integrity. I thank my friend from the
nano-lab, too, for going the extra mile, while thousands stand
by and do... nothing.
But this is not the end of the line for me on Chuck Wade and Art
Campbell's samples. I intend to continue promoting this evidence
and have it looked at by real scientists, not the talking heads
of science. I refuse to just move on, as others in the community
seem all too willing to do.
And there are real scientists out there; some of the people at
my friend's company fit that bill, even encased as they are
within the prison of the corporate and science establishment's
stale mindset their curiousty was inticed.
Someday soon I hope to help write the final chapter on Campbell
and Chuck Wade's testimony and material. But "Evidence" Part 3,
will have to wait.
I believe right now the UFO question is about to be settled and
we will be right... not because we are so insightfull, but
because we have witnessed. And what many of us have witnessed
including some men who have gone into space is like nothing we
have on here earth.
Labels: Opinion